Johnson & Johnson quickly identified and analyzed a high-risk non–muscle invasive bladder cancer (HR-NMIBC) population using HealthVerity Marketplace. By using linked, privacy-compliant claims and EHR data, they uncovered meaningful treatment patterns and a surprising care gap in patients where the first-line treatment failed.
Non–muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is a form of bladder cancer in which tumors are limited to the bladder wall and have not invaded the underlying muscle. Despite being "non-muscle invasive," NMIBC is not necessarily low-risk. Patients can still experience aggressive disease, especially when the cancer is classified as high-risk based on factors such as tumor grade, size, multifocality, recurrence, and the presence of carcinoma in situ (CIS), a flat, high-grade lesion associated with a greater chance of progression.1
The recommended standard of care for HR-NMIBC is surgery to remove the visible parts of the tumor, followed by intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) immunotherapy. BCG is a weakened strain of Mycobacterium bovis, the same bacteria used in the tuberculosis vaccine. Delivered directly into the bladder through a catheter, BCG works not by directly killing cancer cells, but by invoking a local immune response to help destroy any cancer cells that remain after surgery.1
Johnson & Johnson conducted a retrospective real-world data study to understand how patients with HR-NMIBC and carcinoma in situ (CIS) are treated after failing first-line BCG therapy.2 The study used HealthVerity linked claims and EHR data from October 2015 to December 2022. Analysis of this RWD data enabled the following insightful findings (Figure 1):
Figure 1: NMIBC patient journey from 2015-2022. Data built using claims and EHR data from HealthVerity in Bourla et al.2
More than half of BCG-unresponsive CIS patients received no further treatment for at least a year after recurrence, and among those who were treated, most received therapies with only modest results. The real-world evidence study reinforces the urgent need for novel, effective, bladder-sparing therapies in this population. Figure 2 shows of those that did receive subsequent therapy, which ones were most common. Despite being the recommended next line of treatment, radical cystectomy was used in only 25% of patients.
Figure 2: Subsequent treatments for BCG-unresponsive HR-NMIBC patients (n=486). Data built using claims and EHR data from HealthVerity in Bourla et al.2
For oncology data leaders navigating complex treatment landscapes like HR-NMIBC, partnering with HealthVerity means unlocking faster timelines, greater confidence, and regulatory-grade precision.
With access to the nation’s largest privacy-compliant healthcare data ecosystem, HealthVerity empowers pharma teams to:
Whether you're validating market opportunity, supporting label expansion, or preparing for FDA submission, HealthVerity ensures repeatable, interoperable, real-world data strategies from day one.
We cover more use-cases and explore how HealthVerity Marketplace works in our webinar, watch a replay or read more here.